In an article in the Economist magazine entitled ‘Froth at the bottom of the pyramid: Is microfinance going the same way as subprime mortgages’ [1], the Economist continues the controversial debate on the ‘microfinance bubble’ that was initiated by a series of provocative articles on the Wall Street Journal and a subsequent blog on the Reuter’s website. These articles have been discussed in previous Microcapital.Org publications [2], [3], [4]. The Economist draws our attention to a view put forward recently by Mr Vikram Akula, founder of India’s SKS Microfinance [5], who expressed disappointment at the recent ‘unbalanced and misleading’ views on microfinance investments and ‘absurd’ sweeping generalisations drawn from anecdotal evidence in one neighbourhood. The Economist reminds us that SKS is about to go public in a ‘doubtless lucrative’ IPO but the views of Mr Akula resonate with the views of other participants in the microfinance sector. Mr Alvaro Rodriguez, former chairman of ACCION International [6] and now chairman of Compartamos Banco [7], finds it hard to see how there can be a ‘bubble’ when, according to estimates, ‘there are currently 100 million microfinance clients out of one billion poor people who want access to financial services’. He added that competition among investors may generate a ‘gold rush’ and lead to ‘frothy lending’ in some instances but stated that competition is a good way to introduce innovation, greater efficiency, better products and pricing into any industry, a development he added that will ultimately benefit the microfinance customers.